<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RichVermillion.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A great place to become enlightened...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton by Rich Vermillion</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Vermillion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Dear Anne Babson,

Yes, I have no qualms in saying that ANY member of the Skull and Bones, including the Bush family, is a member of a satanic secret society…and thus, satanists by definition. William H. Kennedy (not to be confused with the politicians by the same name) included the S&#38;B in his list of satanic cults within his book “Satanic Crime.” The reason for doing so is that their initiation rites are identical to a satanic black mass.

Further, many researchers of the S&#38;B have found reports of people who had infiltrated the building (such as a group of Yale students to rushed the building about 100 years ago to see what was inside, or the many accounts of S&#38;B initiates taking girlfriends in there, who would later share what they saw, and others…). These people unanimously described rooms filled with human bones, and some had seen the “inner sanctum” which was a red velvet-lined room with a satanic alter at its front. So again, yes…anybody (including Stratton, the Bushes, anyone else) who is a member of this cult is a satanist by definition. The only deliverance for them is the same one available to all satanists: Namely, full repentance, renouncing their membership in the S&#38;B, and open exposure of the secret cult’s secrets and schemes.

Do you remember the Ephesians who formerly practiced witchcraft, but who repented, accepted Jesus, and then burned their books openly and publicly exposed and confessed their deeds (Acts 19)? Unless Stratton or one of these do the same (which none have to date), then they can never be saved.

It is also important to note that Adolf Hitler (himself a member of the German “Brotherhood of Death”, the Thule Society….which chartered the S&#38;B and which Stratton and the Bushes are technically “fraternity brothers” with) claimed openly to be a Christian, while all the time practicing witchcraft and murdering people in concentration camps. Thus, the teaching of “False Brethren” that exists in the New Testament has been too-long overlooked, and we have ALL been taken in by the “profession” of people who are full of devils, and not the Spirit of God. So with that said, I openly profess that Stratton had me “fooled” for a season as I wrote a book with him…but I did eventually discern him, and immediately did what any other true Christian should do: Namely, I got away from him, and later exposed him to protect others.

Regarding your political questions: I am a Bible-based believer who bases my political ideology on Scripture, so I cannot be easily classified as either “right” or “left” because I think such labels are used to confuse the issues rather than address them. Most of those professing to be “Leftist” are extremely hostile to biblical principles of morality and holiness, so we don’t see eye-to-eye on many topics. However, some people who are considered “right-leaning” or even “extreme right” leaning people are similarly out of step with Scripture on issues of caring for the poor and limited military intervention.

So, I just vote Bible…and in this past primary cycle (as some of my articles herein attest) I have been a supporter of Ron Paul. So, no…I am not a companion of Jesse Jackson in his beliefs or political rhetoric, and I don’t consider the 2000 election "stolen."

I actually voted for Bush in both 2000 and 2004. However, now that I have taken the time to research the S&#38;B I no longer support him, nor consider him a “Christian” president in any way. With a little research it becomes obvious that Bush’s policies are designed for achieving S&#38;B objectives, not biblical ones. And it has been noted that since his ‘04 re-election, he rarely mentions the Name of Jesus anymore, and has been supporting initiatives aimed at forming a one-world-religion–which I REFUSE to support or participate in. There is One Lord, and I serve Him, and Him only. Period.

Regarding Copeland, Fallwell, Robertson &#38; the such: Note that Robertson is a high-level Freemason, as his cover pose on Time Magazine in 1986 attests as he is striking a Masonic “claw” pose (and Time was founded by the S&#38;B, by the way). Here's the link to the TIME Magazine archives so you can see it yourself: http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19860217,00.html

So, yes, I consider Robertson "compromised" and not a Christian (at least, needing significant deliverance through manifest repentance). That is why he was likely ASKED by the S&#38;B to feature Stratton on the 700 Club, and why his comments during the interview reveal that Robertson knows quite a bit about the S&#38;B (probably from personal exposure thereto).

Jerry Fallwell knowingly accepted millions of dollars from Sun Myung Moon–who claims to be the Messiah incarnate. Note the following link: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Moonies/jerry_falwell_and_myung_moon.htm

And Kenneth Copeland (who I have personally known also) is buddies with Stratton, Robertson, Doug Wead (who worked for both S&#38;B Bushes), and countless members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Thus, I consider him backslidden also, and if you do an online search regarding these people/entities, you will easily see why.

So, I agree with you that the S&#38;B is a fascist, elitist, and anti-democratic establishment. But I also have overwhelming evidence that it is TRULY a satanic organization also, as the YouTube videos embedded herein clearly show too. So Anne, you and I are in at least partial agreement on these issues, and I trust my answer here clarifies my positions for you even further.

Thanks for commenting and asking your questions. I am blessed you did.

-Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Anne Babson,</p>
<p>Yes, I have no qualms in saying that ANY member of the Skull and Bones, including the Bush family, is a member of a satanic secret society…and thus, satanists by definition. William H. Kennedy (not to be confused with the politicians by the same name) included the S&amp;B in his list of satanic cults within his book “Satanic Crime.” The reason for doing so is that their initiation rites are identical to a satanic black mass.</p>
<p>Further, many researchers of the S&amp;B have found reports of people who had infiltrated the building (such as a group of Yale students to rushed the building about 100 years ago to see what was inside, or the many accounts of S&amp;B initiates taking girlfriends in there, who would later share what they saw, and others…). These people unanimously described rooms filled with human bones, and some had seen the “inner sanctum” which was a red velvet-lined room with a satanic alter at its front. So again, yes…anybody (including Stratton, the Bushes, anyone else) who is a member of this cult is a satanist by definition. The only deliverance for them is the same one available to all satanists: Namely, full repentance, renouncing their membership in the S&amp;B, and open exposure of the secret cult’s secrets and schemes.</p>
<p>Do you remember the Ephesians who formerly practiced witchcraft, but who repented, accepted Jesus, and then burned their books openly and publicly exposed and confessed their deeds (Acts 19)? Unless Stratton or one of these do the same (which none have to date), then they can never be saved.</p>
<p>It is also important to note that Adolf Hitler (himself a member of the German “Brotherhood of Death”, the Thule Society….which chartered the S&amp;B and which Stratton and the Bushes are technically “fraternity brothers” with) claimed openly to be a Christian, while all the time practicing witchcraft and murdering people in concentration camps. Thus, the teaching of “False Brethren” that exists in the New Testament has been too-long overlooked, and we have ALL been taken in by the “profession” of people who are full of devils, and not the Spirit of God. So with that said, I openly profess that Stratton had me “fooled” for a season as I wrote a book with him…but I did eventually discern him, and immediately did what any other true Christian should do: Namely, I got away from him, and later exposed him to protect others.</p>
<p>Regarding your political questions: I am a Bible-based believer who bases my political ideology on Scripture, so I cannot be easily classified as either “right” or “left” because I think such labels are used to confuse the issues rather than address them. Most of those professing to be “Leftist” are extremely hostile to biblical principles of morality and holiness, so we don’t see eye-to-eye on many topics. However, some people who are considered “right-leaning” or even “extreme right” leaning people are similarly out of step with Scripture on issues of caring for the poor and limited military intervention.</p>
<p>So, I just vote Bible…and in this past primary cycle (as some of my articles herein attest) I have been a supporter of Ron Paul. So, no…I am not a companion of Jesse Jackson in his beliefs or political rhetoric, and I don’t consider the 2000 election &#8220;stolen.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually voted for Bush in both 2000 and 2004. However, now that I have taken the time to research the S&amp;B I no longer support him, nor consider him a “Christian” president in any way. With a little research it becomes obvious that Bush’s policies are designed for achieving S&amp;B objectives, not biblical ones. And it has been noted that since his ‘04 re-election, he rarely mentions the Name of Jesus anymore, and has been supporting initiatives aimed at forming a one-world-religion–which I REFUSE to support or participate in. There is One Lord, and I serve Him, and Him only. Period.</p>
<p>Regarding Copeland, Fallwell, Robertson &amp; the such: Note that Robertson is a high-level Freemason, as his cover pose on Time Magazine in 1986 attests as he is striking a Masonic “claw” pose (and Time was founded by the S&amp;B, by the way). Here&#8217;s the link to the TIME Magazine archives so you can see it yourself: <a href="http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19860217,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19860217,00.html</a></p>
<p>So, yes, I consider Robertson &#8220;compromised&#8221; and not a Christian (at least, needing significant deliverance through manifest repentance). That is why he was likely ASKED by the S&amp;B to feature Stratton on the 700 Club, and why his comments during the interview reveal that Robertson knows quite a bit about the S&amp;B (probably from personal exposure thereto).</p>
<p>Jerry Fallwell knowingly accepted millions of dollars from Sun Myung Moon–who claims to be the Messiah incarnate. Note the following link: <a href="http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Moonies/jerry_falwell_and_myung_moon.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Moonies/jerry_falwell_and_myung_moon.htm</a></p>
<p>And Kenneth Copeland (who I have personally known also) is buddies with Stratton, Robertson, Doug Wead (who worked for both S&amp;B Bushes), and countless members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Thus, I consider him backslidden also, and if you do an online search regarding these people/entities, you will easily see why.</p>
<p>So, I agree with you that the S&amp;B is a fascist, elitist, and anti-democratic establishment. But I also have overwhelming evidence that it is TRULY a satanic organization also, as the YouTube videos embedded herein clearly show too. So Anne, you and I are in at least partial agreement on these issues, and I trust my answer here clarifies my positions for you even further.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting and asking your questions. I am blessed you did.</p>
<p>-Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton by annebabson</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>annebabson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Dear Brother Rich,

If you wrote a posting here that suggested that Dan Stratton had moral weaknesses, I would tell you that they are all too common among ALL members of the Body of Christ, and sadly, spiritual leaders have allowed the quest for personal influence and mammon too often  to unduly influence their walk with God.   However, you accuse Pastor Dan Stratton, my former pastor, of being an active satanist, and why?  Because he belongs to Skull and Bones?

I want you to think carefully about the implications of what you are saying.  So many members of the Christian Right believe(d) that George W. Bush was placed in the White House by God.  Are you saying that Pat Robertson, Kenneth Copeland, Jerry Fallwell, and countless others urged Americans to vote for an active satanist?  Are you saying that the entire  spiritual community of the USA was blind to an active Satanism being placed in the White House, that NO ONE on the Right had a warning, that The Reverend Jesse Jackson's inauguration day protest was a  Jeremaiad, that he spoke for God when he said that the White House was stolen?  Are you a member of the Barak Obama Christian Left, as I am?  After all, if Stratton is a satanist by virtue of his Skull and Bones membership, so is the entire Bush family.  Are you prepared to say that to all of us?

Skull and Bones is a fascist society.  It is an elitist, anti-democratic establishment.  If you argue that it should be disbanded like other excessive campus fraternities, I believe it is a sound argument that you would be making.  But let's get real -- they are a pathetic bunch of half-witted children of captains of industry -- Bush junior got gentleman Cs at Yale, probably out of sheer mercy -- touching themselves in front of each other.  They are punk-*ss wimps hiding behind their windowless walls much like members of the KKK hide behind sheets while they enact war games that get the children of honest, hard-working Americans killed.  But satanist?  Only in  as much as  the  CIA and Wall  Street, that the  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the other bastions of worldly  power are.  Satanist?  No.  Lame.  Flaccid. Effete.  Unamerican.  Those words apply, not yours, and Dan Stratton has weaknesses of character, like all of us, but he is no satanist -- you should know.  You ghost-wrote for him.

Anne Babson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Brother Rich,</p>
<p>If you wrote a posting here that suggested that Dan Stratton had moral weaknesses, I would tell you that they are all too common among ALL members of the Body of Christ, and sadly, spiritual leaders have allowed the quest for personal influence and mammon too often  to unduly influence their walk with God.   However, you accuse Pastor Dan Stratton, my former pastor, of being an active satanist, and why?  Because he belongs to Skull and Bones?</p>
<p>I want you to think carefully about the implications of what you are saying.  So many members of the Christian Right believe(d) that George W. Bush was placed in the White House by God.  Are you saying that Pat Robertson, Kenneth Copeland, Jerry Fallwell, and countless others urged Americans to vote for an active satanist?  Are you saying that the entire  spiritual community of the USA was blind to an active Satanism being placed in the White House, that NO ONE on the Right had a warning, that The Reverend Jesse Jackson&#8217;s inauguration day protest was a  Jeremaiad, that he spoke for God when he said that the White House was stolen?  Are you a member of the Barak Obama Christian Left, as I am?  After all, if Stratton is a satanist by virtue of his Skull and Bones membership, so is the entire Bush family.  Are you prepared to say that to all of us?</p>
<p>Skull and Bones is a fascist society.  It is an elitist, anti-democratic establishment.  If you argue that it should be disbanded like other excessive campus fraternities, I believe it is a sound argument that you would be making.  But let&#8217;s get real &#8212; they are a pathetic bunch of half-witted children of captains of industry &#8212; Bush junior got gentleman Cs at Yale, probably out of sheer mercy &#8212; touching themselves in front of each other.  They are punk-*ss wimps hiding behind their windowless walls much like members of the KKK hide behind sheets while they enact war games that get the children of honest, hard-working Americans killed.  But satanist?  Only in  as much as  the  CIA and Wall  Street, that the  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the other bastions of worldly  power are.  Satanist?  No.  Lame.  Flaccid. Effete.  Unamerican.  Those words apply, not yours, and Dan Stratton has weaknesses of character, like all of us, but he is no satanist &#8212; you should know.  You ghost-wrote for him.</p>
<p>Anne Babson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton by nobukisan</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>nobukisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Dear Rich,

I am glad to see someone addressing Dan Stratton's various issues.  I too attended FEF for many years and know the inner workings of the "church".      I saw a huge change in Dan over the years from when he first started until 9/11.      The S &#38; B membership issue is well known and he has been even told by his mentors to resign but he is fearful of the loss of power he incur.      There are many improprieties financial as well as spiritual that occur within FEF.      There is a great deal of abuse of power and people that I witness over the years.    There is no accountability on any level.   Dan has tried to become "jewish" through his purported studies of judaism and the hebrew language.   He twists information to the unsuspecting people who come to hear him.     

There are so many things that I could write about but Rich, you have covered most of them.   He is someone that is not to be trusted with your soul, spiritual development or finances.   His goal is to "make deals" and lots of money to support his lifestyle regardless of who he steps on in the process.   His business dealings are not done with integrity nor the love of God.     His goal is to crush his enemies (as he perceives them to be).     It is all very sad...so many people over the years have been hurt.   

A rabbi once asked if the church is called Faith Exchange, what are you exchanging your faith for???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rich,</p>
<p>I am glad to see someone addressing Dan Stratton&#8217;s various issues.  I too attended FEF for many years and know the inner workings of the &#8220;church&#8221;.      I saw a huge change in Dan over the years from when he first started until 9/11.      The S &amp; B membership issue is well known and he has been even told by his mentors to resign but he is fearful of the loss of power he incur.      There are many improprieties financial as well as spiritual that occur within FEF.      There is a great deal of abuse of power and people that I witness over the years.    There is no accountability on any level.   Dan has tried to become &#8220;jewish&#8221; through his purported studies of judaism and the hebrew language.   He twists information to the unsuspecting people who come to hear him.     </p>
<p>There are so many things that I could write about but Rich, you have covered most of them.   He is someone that is not to be trusted with your soul, spiritual development or finances.   His goal is to &#8220;make deals&#8221; and lots of money to support his lifestyle regardless of who he steps on in the process.   His business dealings are not done with integrity nor the love of God.     His goal is to crush his enemies (as he perceives them to be).     It is all very sad&#8230;so many people over the years have been hurt.   </p>
<p>A rabbi once asked if the church is called Faith Exchange, what are you exchanging your faith for???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton by Skull and Bones Post Significantly Revised &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Skull and Bones Post Significantly Revised &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments About &#8220;Bonesman&#8221; Stratton by Derek</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/comments-about-bonesman-stratton/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I visited Faith Exchange a couple years ago and was immediately added to their family list.

What bothered me about the service--and the reason I did not return--was the absence of the name of Jesus. And because I still receive the monthly newsletter, it's clear this is a congregation that "dare not speak His name."

I find it creepy that a "Christian church" in 2008 in NYC makes the effort to ONLY speak Hebrew names for God -- in the service and on the written page.

And some pastor friends in Westchester, about an hour north of the city, also started getting the Faith Exchange bulletin and the pastor's wife--without knowing I had visited there--asked me, "Do you know anything about this 'Hebrew church' in the city?  They send us their bulletins but they never mention Jesus..."

I know Dan has exchanged his faith...but what has he gotten in return?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visited Faith Exchange a couple years ago and was immediately added to their family list.</p>
<p>What bothered me about the service&#8211;and the reason I did not return&#8211;was the absence of the name of Jesus. And because I still receive the monthly newsletter, it&#8217;s clear this is a congregation that &#8220;dare not speak His name.&#8221;</p>
<p>I find it creepy that a &#8220;Christian church&#8221; in 2008 in NYC makes the effort to ONLY speak Hebrew names for God &#8212; in the service and on the written page.</p>
<p>And some pastor friends in Westchester, about an hour north of the city, also started getting the Faith Exchange bulletin and the pastor&#8217;s wife&#8211;without knowing I had visited there&#8211;asked me, &#8220;Do you know anything about this &#8216;Hebrew church&#8217; in the city?  They send us their bulletins but they never mention Jesus&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I know Dan has exchanged his faith&#8230;but what has he gotten in return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The REAL Gospel by How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 2) &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/the-real-gospel/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 2) &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/the-real-gospel/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts: How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 1) , The REAL Gospel  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts: How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 1) , The REAL Gospel  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 2) by How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 1) &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/how-does-love-cover-sins-part-2/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 1) &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part&#160;2)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part&nbsp;2)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 1) by How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 2) &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/how-does-love-cover-sins-part-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>How Does Love Cover Sins? (Part 2) &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/how-does-love-cover-sins-part-1/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] time to delve deeper into this topic and examine the Bible way for covering sins through love. In Part 1 we discussed the fact that there is tremendous scriptural evidence to conclude that none of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time to delve deeper into this topic and examine the Bible way for covering sins through love. In Part 1 we discussed the fact that there is tremendous scriptural evidence to conclude that none of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on True Character: Highlighting Mike Gravel and Ron Paul by Christian Business Daily Endorses Ron Paul for President &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/true-character-highlighting-mike-gravel-and-ron-paul/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Business Daily Endorses Ron Paul for President &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/true-character-highlighting-mike-gravel-and-ron-paul/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Related articles: Why Ron Paul supporters look familiar, Is Huckabee Honest?, Huckabee: Cozy with the One-World-Government Movement, The &#8216;Ron Paul Camp&#8217; Marches On, True Character: Highlighting Mike Gravel and Ron Paul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related articles: Why Ron Paul supporters look familiar, Is Huckabee Honest?, Huckabee: Cozy with the One-World-Government Movement, The &#8216;Ron Paul Camp&#8217; Marches On, True Character: Highlighting Mike Gravel and Ron Paul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8216;Ron Paul Camp&#8217; Marches On by Christian Business Daily Endorses Ron Paul for President &#171; RichVermillion.com</title>
		<link>http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/the-ron-paul-camp-marches-on/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Business Daily Endorses Ron Paul for President &#171; RichVermillion.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richvermillion.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/the-ron-paul-camp-marches-on/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] look familiar, Is Huckabee Honest?, Huckabee: Cozy with the One-World-Government Movement, The &#8216;Ron Paul Camp&#8217; Marches On, True Character: Highlighting Mike Gravel and Ron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] look familiar, Is Huckabee Honest?, Huckabee: Cozy with the One-World-Government Movement, The &#8216;Ron Paul Camp&#8217; Marches On, True Character: Highlighting Mike Gravel and Ron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
